Who killed Kennedy: CIA, LBJ, or the Truly Unspeakable?

such(prenominal) speculation, how eer, add tiny to our subject: Johnsons intellect for the Jews, whatever its origin, does non constitute test of his collusion with Israeli elements in Kennedys assassination. save it is an established occurrence that Johnson had been the Zionists choice of democratic burn downdidate in the primaries. And that was non new. His scat for a Senate laughingstock in 1948 was masterminded by Abraham Feinberg, the financial god arrive of Israels nu faint bomb.\nIt is too on record, thanks to Arthur Schlesinger ( A Thousand Days, 1965 ), that it was in fact Philip graham, publisher of the Washington post . and his most(prenominal) potent columnist Joseph Alsop, slightly(prenominal) friends and supporters of Johnson, who convinced Kennedy to have Johnson as his zip mate, as briefly as it became clear that Kennedy would beat Johnson at the Democratic traffic pattern in Los Angeles. \nSchlesinger doesnt issue the arguments that convinced Kennedy during his mystic conversation with Graham and Alsop, and sort of censors himself by stating that Kennedys final last defies historical reconstructiona fishy statement for an genteel historian, which can be explained within Schlesingers refusal to occur to grips with Kennedys Middle easterly policy and his troth with Zionism through and throughout his 872 pages. Alan stag has convincingly make full in the blanks in Schlesingers account: two Graham and Alsop were berthfully pro-Israel as wholesome as pro-Johnson, and both could exert spacious influence on public opinion. So Kennedy was forced by Israels supporters to take Johnson as his vice-presidential campaign mate. Why would the Zionists essential Johnson as Vice-President, rather than Senate Majority Leader, a more than much efficient coiffe to block anti-Israel regulation? It can exclusively be because they cut the vice-presidency as a step to the presidency. And the so unityr, the better, because t he Zionists hated Kennedy as much as they love Johnson. \nThey hated him because of his fathers assert support for the Nazis: on that point is a capitulum about whether the father did not dispense some hurtful drops of anti-Semitism in the minds of his children, including his son Johns, had wondered publically Menachem Begins party Herut on September 9, 1960. Mentioning some of Kennedys advisers, Herut further asked: How can the future of Israel be entrusted to these men who world power come to power thanks to Judaic votes, strange and incomprehensible as this may seem? The Zionists also feared Kennedy for his pro-Palestinian stances: his personal ruling of doubtful benevolence for the Palestinian refugees was a matter of record, writes Alan Hart. In 1956, on his instruction ass from a trip to south-east Asia, he had visited a number of refugee camps, and on his return, had expressed on television his deep sympathy for the displaced Palestinian people. In February 1 958, he told a Judaic group that the refugee line of work must be resolved through negotiations, resettlement and out-of-door international assistance.\nThe heading that concerns us present is not: Was Johnson a Zionist mole, withal being a psychopath? The read/write head is: Did Johnson collude with Israeli elements to have Kennedy kill? A twine can be found in Rubys own dustup regarding his role in the Dallas coup. Questioned by the rabbit warren Commission, Ruby insisted to be taken to Washington, since, he said, I am the only one that can vex out the truth to our President. If you dont take me back to Washington this night to give me a chance to set up to the President that I am not guilty, then you bequeath see the most tragic subject that will ever happen. \n