Case Study †Profitel Inc Essay

Decision maker Lars Peeters, along with his team of executives suspense 1 Which perspective of leadership best explains the problems experienced in this skid? Analyze the reason using concepts discussed in that leadership perspective. Leadership is delimit as the collective effectiveness and successes of organizations members by influencing, motivating, and enabling others to contribute. In this case Lars Peeters, newly appointed CEO of Profitel, fails to maintain his role by absentminded key ingredients central for effective leadership. Together with his executive team he hired from his previous employment, weaken Profitels image and success with customers, administration leaders and even employees.Listed below are perspectives of leadership I flummox identified in this case that best explain the problems at break Contingency Perspective Lars had not diagnosed Profitelss situation thoroughly and equal their style and objectives to fit that situation. Instead of using the emp loyees thoughts and insights as a powerful recourses, Lars went ahead with his team of executives and implemented his strategies disregarding any feedback. behavioral Perspective Although Lars displays task-oriented behavior by pushing company to reach a certain goal, he lacks in people-oriented behavioral skills. This could explain for his disregard to his subordinates avow and lack of employee morale. Transformational Perspective Lars failed to create a strategic vision for Profitel. By using one he could pay off build employee morale by increasing commitment and rewarding ground on performances.Questions 2 What hind end organizations do to minimize the leadership problems discussed above? In this case Profitels broad based there to hire Lars as CEO based on reputation rather than focusing on how his expertise could social welfare their company. Lars took incentive in implementing all major decisions without others input or involvement. The carte du jour of directors seemed to have minimal role in the companys study and should have taken more precautions like overseeing major decisions. Also they should have evaluated his internal performance through feedback from employees and external performance through customers.