Response to Stuart Keisman’s Reflection Essay

I agree with what Stuart wrote close to citizenry using unique methods when they call. Everybody does exhaust their let, individual(a) way of language, and this results from pots personal source, combined with the environment that they were raised in. I capture observe this myself, but it overly seems that large number speak in assorted manners when they ar nearly various batch. The like person can sound like, or give differents the impression of, a completely unlike person depending on how they speak in different environments. This particularly affects shy plenty.Around people that a shy person does not know very well, he or she may be reserved, but when in comfort up to(p) settings, he or she may be much to a greater extent out expiry and talkative. This is also when people, such as myself, conduct to use slang words or speak in familiar ways, but around strangers, people generally tend to speak in more bring inal manners. Stuart did a great job summarizing how most people operate when speaking. I do the same things that he described. In my own experience, I attain basic ways of talking, but they atomic number 18 different when I am around different people.I find myself able to joke around with friends, where it would be hard for me, and make me uncomfortable to do the same with strangers or new acquaintances. In my life I have also spy that people seem to form opinions about my book of facts base on my word choice, just like people do about Stuart has when he refrains from using bad words. Also, when I joke around with people who do not have a good gumption of humor, I find it harder to communicate or connect with them. If I were going to apply Stuarts ideas to my teaching, I would emphasize the different word choices that people use when they atomic number 18 in particular settings.I think it is dread(a) that people may seem like different people when they be in school, or church, but they are their usual, relaxed self when in they are in familiar company. Identifying how people verbally react to particular settings is a great way to generalise how individuals think and it provides insight to their character. Response to Jodi Arbus reprehension I agree with Jodi that particular regions of various countries have individual dialects. raft in the Midwestern states speak very differently from people in the south, or northeast.Sometimes the trys are so strong that it is hard to understand what people from other parts of the country are even saying. provided dialect, or accent, seems to result not at all from the personal character or word choice of someone, but from the environment he or she was raised in. People are able to adapt, and accents or dialects are examples of our adaptation, because we get going in with them. When we move to a new place, eventually most of us bequeath lose our own accents and adopt the one of our new home.I do not know whether or not Jodi is right about male and female spee ch, as people of both sexes seem to have unrestricted speech characteristics based on their gender. In my own experience, I have noticed that my own accent separates me from certain people, and gives me something in familiar with other Mexican Americans. As English is my second language, I have a noticeable accent, and it lets people identify certain things about me. This accent also allows people to know things about how, and what community, I was raised in. Jodi also talked about the difference between male and female speech.I am not sure if I have noticed any differences other than that males usually use more slang and a more relaxed form of speech when in comfortable settings. I have also noticed the differences in formalities that people use in certain areas. In the areas where I grew up, people often divvy up each other in familiar tones, but when speaking to people from other areas, we are more formal. In the south, Jodi notices a key feature that people use when speaking they are often very formal and courteous, even to people who are somewhat familiar.This is interesting, because in my experience, I have noticed that many people do not even address strangers in ways that are very formal or customary. But I have noticed that this is different in other areas. I would use what Jodi wrote in my teachings by emphasizing accents or dialects that people use. These are important ways of savvy the characters of individuals, and determining what is a result of peoples character, instead of a result of the environment they were raised in. Also, it would be important to teach the differences in language from certain regions.Not only are the accents different, but the formality may be different as well. In the south, where people address one another in more formal ways, and say maam and sir more often , it is important to know the ways that people speak to know how to be inoffensive. So I would teach the differences in speech of certain regions, as that would help outsiders to seem friendly and elegant when visiting. Understanding lingual characteristics in certain areas, and the differences from place to place will help people to communicate in friendly manners with people who are unfamiliar.